PMK MLA Accuses Election Commission of Bias, Claims It's 'Bought' by Rival Faction
PMK MLA Slams ECI as 'Unreliable', Claims Rival Bought Influence

PMK Legislator Levels Serious Allegations Against Election Commission in Salem

In a fiery press conference held in Salem city on Tuesday, PMK MLA R Arul launched a blistering critique of the Election Commission of India (ECI), accusing the constitutional body of abandoning principles of justice and fairness. The lawmaker declared that the institution has transformed into what he described as an "unreliable and costly" entity that no longer commands public trust.

Recognition of Leadership Sparks Controversy

The controversy stems from the ECI's official stance, reiterated just a day earlier on Monday, which recognizes Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss as the legitimate leader of the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK). Arul vehemently contested this designation, asserting that the commission's decision lacks legitimacy and is the result of improper influence.

"The faction led by Anbumani is engaging in politics through deception," Arul told assembled journalists. "They have managed to purchase the Election Commission because they found it impossible to purchase justice from the courts." This extraordinary allegation suggests a direct financial corruption claim against the election oversight body.

Allegations of Political Influence and Alliance Politics

Arul further elaborated on his accusations by pointing to Anbumani Ramadoss's political affiliations. He specifically highlighted Ramadoss's alignment with the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), suggesting this connection has been leveraged to exert undue pressure on the Election Commission through "connections at the Centre."

The MLA argued that this alleged influence has created an uneven playing field, compromising the ECI's constitutional mandate to conduct free and fair elections. He contrasted this with what he presented as the legitimate claim to the party's identity and symbols.

Symbolism and Succession in Party Politics

A significant point of contention revolves around the PMK's iconic 'mango' election symbol. Arul firmly stated that this symbol rightfully belongs to Dr. S. Ramadoss, the party founder and Anbumani's father, implying that the son's faction has improperly claimed it through institutional manipulation rather than legitimate succession.

"The alliance that will ultimately emerge victorious is the one formed under the true leadership of Ramadoss," Arul predicted, drawing a clear distinction between what he views as authentic and illegitimate factions within the party.

He concluded with a pointed remark about political legitimacy and familial respect: "Only those who demonstrate genuine respect for their father can truly attain power and achieve success in the political arena." This statement underscores the deep personal and dynastic dimensions of the internal PMK conflict, framing it as both a political and a familial dispute over rightful inheritance and authority.

The allegations represent a significant escalation in the ongoing internal strife within the PMK and pose serious questions about the perceived impartiality of India's premier election management body. Such public condemnation from a sitting legislator adds considerable weight to the controversy, potentially influencing public perception ahead of future electoral processes.