A political storm is brewing in the Ahirwal region of Haryana over the use of the title 'Rao'. What began as a statement by a legislator has escalated into one of south Haryana's most intense identity disputes, pitting a state cabinet minister against the family legacy of a Union minister.
Origin of the Controversy
The dispute ignited when Narnaul MLA Om Prakash Yadav claimed that the right to use 'Rao' as a title belongs exclusively to the family of Union Minister Rao Inderjit Singh. Yadav stated, 'The title was conferred on Rao Inderjit Singh's ancestors, and his family has undivided rights over it. Rao Inderjit Singh has helped Rao Narbir Singh multiple times.' This assertion drew an immediate and sharp rebuttal.
Cabinet Minister's Response
Haryana Cabinet Minister Rao Narbir Singh countered by producing what he described as 'documentary proof' from the British era. 'We have an official British period document that records that the then Viceroy conferred the title 'Rao' on my grandfather on June 14, 1945. My family has been using the title for decades and has justified it with service to the community and the state,' said Narbir Singh. He also rejected any suggestion of political debt to Rao Inderjit Singh's camp, asserting, 'I have never sought his support in any election. I have built my own identity.'
Union Minister's Silence
Rao Inderjit Singh has not commented on the issue so far. Historically, 'Rao' is not a caste surname but a title of distinction conferred for valour, administrative ability, and feudal contribution across communities, including Rajputs, Ahir-Yadavs, and Maratha sardars. In the Ahirwal region, the title carries significant weight, given the towering legacy of Rao Tula Ram, the celebrated freedom fighter of 1857 whose name commands reverence.
Key Statements
- Om Prakash Yadav (Narnaul MLA): 'The right to use 'Rao' as a title belongs exclusively to the family of Rao Inderjit Singh. The title was conferred on his ancestors and his family.'
- Rao Narbir Singh (State Cabinet Minister): 'We have an official British period document that records that the Viceroy conferred the title on my grandfather in 1945. My family has been using it for decades.'
The row highlights the deep emotional and historical significance attached to titles in the region, with both sides claiming legitimacy based on historical records and community service.
