The first Election Commission built India’s democracy by ensuring every eligible citizen found a place on the electoral roll. The current Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drifts from that tradition, raising concerns about inclusivity and fairness.
What Is the Special Intensive Revision?
The SIR is a focused drive to update voter lists, often ahead of elections. However, critics argue it has been used to remove names disproportionately, targeting specific communities or areas. According to Devanoora Mahadeva, writing in an opinion piece, the process lacks transparency and may skew the rolls.
Departure from Foundational Principles
India’s first EC prioritized adding every eligible voter, even in remote regions. The SIR, by contrast, emphasizes deletion of duplicate or deceased voters but often errs on the side of removal. Data shows that in some states, over 10% of names were struck off, with minimal opportunity for affected citizens to contest.
Impact on Democracy
A skewed voter list undermines electoral integrity. If certain groups are systematically excluded, election outcomes may not reflect the true will of the people. Mahadeva notes that the SIR has been implemented without adequate public notice or grievance redressal, violating the spirit of the Representation of the People Act.
Calls for Reform
Electoral watchdogs have urged the EC to revert to the original approach: prioritize inclusion, verify deletions carefully, and allow appeals. The SIR, as currently practiced, risks turning a special revision into a skewed one.
