The Karnataka High Court has dismissed a petition challenging Section 38D of the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) Act. The provision, introduced in 2020, pertains to the allotment of BDA land in favor of the original owner, subsequent purchaser, or an unauthorized occupant.
Background of the Case
The plea argued that Section 38D violates the principles of natural justice and the right to equality. However, the court found no merit in the contention and upheld the validity of the provision.
Key Highlights
- The provision allows regularization of unauthorized occupations under certain conditions.
- It aims to resolve long-standing disputes over BDA land.
- The court observed that the provision is within the legislative competence of the state.
The judgment is expected to impact several pending cases related to BDA land allotment.
—
