Kerala CM Vijayan Criticizes UDF Conduct in House, Cites High Court Praise for Sabarimala Gold Probe
Kerala CM Slams UDF, Notes Court Praise for Sabarimala Gold Probe

In a significant development in the ongoing Sabarimala gold heist case, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has strongly criticized the conduct of the United Democratic Front (UDF) in the State Assembly, labeling it as deplorable and unfortunate. The remarks came amid heated discussions surrounding the alleged misappropriation of gold from the sacred Lord Ayyappa shrine at Sabarimala, a case that has captured widespread attention across Kerala and beyond.

High Court Commends SIT Probe in Sabarimala Gold Case

Vijayan pointed out that a division bench of the Kerala High Court, which has been closely monitoring the investigation by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) into the gold theft allegations, has praised the efforts of the investigative team. This judicial endorsement adds a layer of credibility to the probe, which aims to uncover the truth behind the reported gold misappropriation from the temple, a site of immense religious significance for devotees.

UDF's Behavior in Assembly Draws Sharp Rebuke

The Chief Minister expressed deep disappointment over the UDF's actions during House proceedings, describing their conduct as deplorable. He emphasized that such behavior undermines the decorum and effectiveness of legislative discussions, especially on sensitive matters like the Sabarimala issue, which involves both legal and religious dimensions. Vijayan's comments highlight the political tensions in Kerala, where the Sabarimala row has been a contentious topic, often sparking debates between the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and the opposition UDF.

Background of the Sabarimala Gold Heist Investigation

The Sabarimala gold heist case revolves around allegations of gold being misappropriated from the temple, leading to the formation of an SIT to conduct a thorough inquiry. The Kerala High Court's involvement in overseeing the probe underscores the seriousness of the allegations and the need for a transparent investigation. The court's praise for the SIT suggests progress in the case, potentially paving the way for accountability and justice in this high-profile matter.

As the investigation continues, the political fallout from the UDF's conduct and the judicial validation of the SIT's work are likely to influence public perception and future developments in Kerala's political landscape. The Sabarimala issue remains a focal point, intertwining faith, law, and governance in the state.