Forensic Report Finds No Evidence of 'No Guru' Remark by Atishi
A forensic analysis has cleared Delhi Minister Atishi of making a controversial 'no guru' remark. The report states there is no audio or video proof to support the claim. This development comes amid a heated political dispute between the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and Delhi's legislative speaker.
AAP and Bhagwant Mann Launch Strong Counterattack
Following the forensic findings, AAP leaders have launched a vigorous defense. Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann joined the fray, hitting back at the Delhi speaker's allegations. Mann emphasized that the claims were baseless and politically motivated.
The party accused the speaker of spreading misinformation to tarnish Atishi's reputation. AAP officials stated they have full confidence in the forensic report's conclusions. They demanded an apology from the speaker for making unfounded accusations.
Details of the Forensic Investigation
The forensic examination was conducted on available recordings of Atishi's speeches. Experts analyzed the audio and video materials thoroughly. They found no instance where Atishi made the alleged 'no guru' comment. The report highlights the importance of verifying claims before making public statements.
This investigation was initiated after the Delhi speaker raised the issue in the legislative assembly. The speaker had claimed that Atishi disrespected spiritual leaders in her remarks. However, the forensic evidence now contradicts this assertion.
Political Implications and Reactions
The row has significant political implications in Delhi and Punjab. AAP views this as an attempt to undermine its leaders. Bhagwant Mann's involvement shows the party's united front against what they call 'false propaganda'.
Key points from the reactions include:
- AAP's demand for the speaker to retract his statements
- Mann's assertion that such tactics won't affect AAP's governance
- Calls for more responsible conduct from elected officials
The incident underscores the tense relations between AAP and opposition figures in Delhi's political landscape. It also raises questions about the use of unverified claims in political discourse.
What Happens Next?
With the forensic report in hand, AAP plans to pursue the matter further. They may seek formal redressal through appropriate channels. The Delhi speaker has yet to respond to the latest developments.
This case serves as a reminder about the need for evidence-based politics. It also highlights how forensic technology can play a role in resolving political disputes. The outcome could influence future interactions between AAP and its political rivals.
